🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the corporation's branch in Zambia to the African officials requests measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The company is attempting amendments to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavoured tobacco products, and reduced sanctions for any companies violating the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about business sector influence with health policies. Recently, WHO officials issued a warning that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” stated the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be lowered to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities specifically advises a caution must occupy at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings need to encompass 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

BAT asks for the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The draft bill suggests penalties for multiple violations “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

In the letter, the managing director of the African subsidiary claims the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

Chimbala said BAT’s proposed changes would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he said.

“We reside in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and harvest that and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my community's youth are dying … is in itself absolute spiritual failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative stated: “The corporation runs its business in compliance with current country statutes. Further, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the suitable systems which provide for relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that minors should be protected from acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion evolving legislation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which includes growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.